Comparison of photorefraction by Plusoptix A12 and cycloplegic autorefraction in children.

BACKGROUND: Plusoptix photoscreeners are capable of measuring refractive errors of children from 1 meter distance, without cyloplegia. We aimed to compare refractive data obtained from the newest version of Plusoptix (model 12) with cycloplegic autorefraction. METHODS: We examined 111 consecutive children aged 3-7 years first by Plusoptix A12C under manifest condition and subsequently for cycloplegic refraction by Topcon KR-1 tabletop autorefractometer. Sphere, spherical equivalent, cylinder and axis of astigmatism measured by the two methods were analyzed to determine correlation, agreement and differences. RESULTS: Binocular examination of 111 children aged 4.86±1.27 years revealed good agreement between refractive data obtained by Plusoptix and cycloautorefraction, according to Bland-Altman plots. Significant (p < 0.001) and strong correlation was found between all refractive measurements (Pearson's r value of 0.707 for sphere, 0.756 for pherical equivalent, and 0.863 for cylinder). Plusoptix mean sphere, spherical equivalent and cylinder were 1.22, 0.56, and -1.32 D, respectively. Corresponding values for cycloautorefraction were 1.63, 1.00, and -1.26 D. The difference between axis of cylinder measured by the two methods was < 10° in 144 eyes (64.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the significant agreement and correlation between Plusoptix photoscreener and cycloplegic autorefraction, the need for cycloplegic drops in refractive examination of children may be obviated. The mean difference between cylinder measurements are considerably trivial (0.06 D), but sphere is approximately 0.4 D underestimated by Plusoptix compared to cycloautorefraction, on average.

Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.

Objectives: Determining the accuracy of cycloplegic refractive error measurements made with the Spot Vision Screener (SVS, Welch Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) is important for refractive assessment of uncooperative patients during optometric examinations. This study compared cycloplegic refractive errors measured by SVS and tabletop autorefractometer to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 subjects were examined in the study. Refractive error measurements were obtained under cycloplegia using retinoscopy, SVS, and Nidek ARK-530 tabletop autorefractometer (ARK-530, Nidek, Japan). Spherical and cylindrical values, spherical equivalents (SE), and Jackson cross-cylinder values at axes of 0° (J0) and 45° (J45) were recorded. Correlations between methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean age was 7 years (range: 6 months-17 years). Sixteen (36%) of the subjects were female and 28 (64%) were male. For SE there was excellent agreement between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.924) and between retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.995). While there was a moderate correlation between retinoscopy and SVS for cylindrical values (ICC: 0.686), excellent correlation was detected between retinoscopy and autorefractometer (ICC: 0.966). J0 and J45 crosscylinder power values were not correlated between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.472) or retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.442). Retinoscopy was correlated with both SVS and tabletop autorefractometer for all parameters within ±1.96 standard deviations in Bland-Altman analysis. Conclusion: Cycloplegic retinoscopy is the gold standard for refractive error measurement in the pediatric population. However, it requires time and experienced professionals. This study revealed moderate to good agreement between SVS and retinoscopy, with better agreement in spherical errors than cylindrical errors. Although the SVS is intended for screening programs, it may also be useful in the pediatric eye office to estimate spherical refractive error in uncooperative patients.

Preliminary study of a new online and equipment-free vision screening alternative for remote and isolated community.

INTRODUCTION: Vision screening has been initiated to detect potential vision problems, paving referral pathways towards a full eye examination. Time-cost-labour practicality challenges of equipment-based vision screening have lingered for decades. Going for the highest sensitivity and specificity or opting for a pragmatic and affordable vision screening program remains a dilemma in public eye health. We aimed to report the development of a new online and equipment-free vision screening called Eye: Questionnairebased Vision Screening (EyeQVS). We also analysed the visual profile of Orang Bateq resided in a remote locality, using findings from EyeQVS, single test vision screening and full eye examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-perspective development strategies were employed in designing EyeQVS. The questionnaire items were constructed using the working backward technique, compiling common vision disorders from the literature and face validation using expert panels. Face validation and usability assessment were performed on EyeQVS. The vision screening was carried out using EyeQVS and single test visual acuity screening method. The full eye examination included visual acuity, refraction, binocular vision and ocular health assessment. The visual profile of indigenous people (Orang Bateq) at Kampung Bengoi and Kampung Atok, Jerantut, Pahang was analysed using EyeQVS, single test visual acuity screening method and full eye examination. RESULTS: The performance of EyeQVS was affirmative in both face validation and usability. About 95% of Orang Bateq failed full eye examination, while 55% failed EyeQVS screening. None of them failed single test vision screening. Binocular disorders and dry eye problems were commonly found in Orang Bateq. EyeQVS unearthed more various vision problems compared to the single test vision screening (visual acuity alone) as a screening tool in a remote location. CONCLUSION: EyeQVS can screen for binocular disorders and dry eyes problem commonly found among indigenous people, which might be missed using a single-test visual acuity screening approach. EyeQVS is a practical alternative for vision screening in places where financial or location hinders eye healthcare access.

The Slitscope.

Slit lamp biomicroscope is the right hand of an Ophthalmologist. Even though precise, its bulky design and complex working process are limiting constraints, making it difficult for screening at outreach camps, which are an integral part of this field for the purpose of eliminating needless blindness. The torchlight is the main tool used for screening. Recently, the integration of smartphones with instruments and the digitization of slit lamp has been explored, to provide simple and easy hacks. By bringing the slit of the slit lamp to traditional torchlight, we have created "The Slitscope". It combines the best of both worlds as a simple innovative do-it-yourself novel technique for precise cataract screening. It is especially useful in peripheral centers, vision centers, and outreach camps. We present two prototypes which can also be 3D printed.

Newborn and infant vision screening in primary care: A clinical review.

PURPOSE: Newborn and infant vision screening is an essential component of the health promotion visit, where the provider screens for ocular risk factors and abnormalities that may cause future impairment or vision loss. Providers may underestimate the importance of screening or find neonatal vision assessments difficult due to poor patient cooperation or time-consuming exams, but the reversibility of vision impairment in infants makes early detection paramount to proper treatment. This article provides a clinical review of evidence-based, practical guidance to providers who care for infants from birth through 6 months of age in the primary care setting. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive eye exam in infants should include a thorough history and physical examination of eye structures, visual acuity, evaluation of extraocular movements and alignment, and assessment of the red reflex. Recommended exam maneuvers differ with age as visual acuity improves and development advances through infancy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Early detection of ocular pathology is critical to avoid permanent vision loss, serious morbidity, and even mortality. The seemingly complex vision screening exam can be completed with little to no cooperation from the patient when a competent pediatric healthcare provider prioritizes opportunistic exam maneuvers. The opportunistic exam allows providers to maximize efficiency while maintaining thorough technique during vision exams and screenings.

Visual Acuity Screening in North Indian Schools: Testing Accuracy and Cost of Alternate Screening Models.

PURPOSE: Our study compares the sensitivity, specificity and cost of visual acuity screening as performed by all class teachers (ACTs), selected teachers (STs) and vision technicians (VTs) in north Indian schools. METHODS: Prospective cluster randomized control studies are conducted in schools in a rural block and an urban-slum of north India. Consenting schools, with a minimum of 800 students aged 6 to 17 years, within a defined study region in both locations, were randomised into three arms: ACTs, STs or VTs. Teachers were trained to test visual acuity. Reduced vision was defined as unable to read equivalent of 20/30. Optometrists, who were masked to results of initial screening, examined all children. Costs were measured for all three arms. RESULTS: The number of students screened were 3410 in 9 ACT schools, 2999 in 9 ST schools and 3071 in 11 VT schools. Vision deficit was found in 214 (6.3%), 349 (11.6%) and 207 (6.7%), (p < .001) children in the ACT, ST and VT arms, respectively. The positive predictive value of VT screening for vision deficit (81.2%) was significantly higher than that of ACTs (42.5%) and STs (30.1%), (p < .001). VTs had significantly higher sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 98.7%, compared to ACTs (36.0% and 96.1%) and STs (44.3% and 91.2%). The cost of screening children with actual visual deficit by ACTs, STs and VTs, was found to be $9.35, $5.79 and $2.82 per child, respectively. CONCLUSION: Greater accuracy and lower cost favours school visual acuity screening by visual technicians in this setting, when they are available.

Hyperopia in schoolchildren: Investigating the impact on vision and determining appropriate methods for screening.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperopia is associated with reduced vision and educational outcomes in schoolchildren. This study explored the impact of clinically significant hyperopia (≥+2.00 D) on visual function in schoolchildren and compared the ability of different screening tests (alone and in combination) to detect this level of hyperopia. METHODS: Vision testing including monocular logMAR visual acuity (VA) measured to threshold (distance [DVA], near [NVA] and DVA through a plus lens [+2.50 D]), stereoacuity and cycloplegic autorefraction (tropicamide 1%) were undertaken on 263 schoolchildren (mean age: 11.76 years ± 3.38) in Queensland, Australia. Vision measures were compared between children with clinically significant hyperopia in at least one meridian (≥+2.00 D) and emmetropia/low hyperopia (>0.00 and <+2.00 D). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed to identify optimal pass/fail criteria for each test and the diagnostic accuracy of individual and combinations of tests. RESULTS: Thirty-two children had clinically significant hyperopia and 225 had emmetropia/low hyperopia. DVA and NVA were worse (p < 0.01), while the difference in DVA through a plus lens was less in children with clinically significant hyperopia (p < 0.01). ROC analysis for individual tests resulted in areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.65 to 0.85. Combining screening tests revealed that failing one or more of the following tests was most effective for detecting hyperopia: DVA, NVA and difference in DVA through a plus lens, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in visual function existed between schoolchildren with clinically significant hyperopia and emmetropia/low hyperopia. Combining measures of DVA and NVA and the difference in DVA through a plus lens demonstrated good discriminative ability for detecting clinically significant hyperopia in this population.

Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.

PURPOSE: By comparing the results of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener (YD-SX-A) versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegic retinoscopy, to evaluate the performance of the YD-SX-A in detecting refractive error in children and adolescents and then judge whether it can be used in refractive screening. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. 1000 participants between the ages of 6 and 18 who visited the Optometry Center of the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from June to December 2022 were selected. First, participants were instructed to measure their diopter with a table-top autorefractor (Topcon KR8800) and YD-SX-A in a noncycloplegic setting. After cycloplegia, they were retinoscopy by a professional optometrist. The results measured by three methods were collected respectively. To avoid deviation, only the right eye (1000 eyes) data were used in the statistical analysis. The Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of diopters measured by the three methods. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to analysis effectiveness of detecting refractive error of YD-SX-A. RESULTS: The average age of participants was 10.77 ± 3.00 years, including 504 boys (50.4%) and 496 girls (49.6%). When YD-SX-A and cycloplegia retinoscopy (CR) were compared in the myopia group, there was no statistical difference in spherical equivalent (SE) (P > 0.05), but there was a statistical difference in diopter spherical (DS) and diopter cylinder (DC) (P < 0.05). Comparing the diopter results of Topcon KR8800 and CR, the difference between each test value in the myopia group was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the hyperopia group, the comparison between YD-SX-A and CR showed no statistically significant differences in the DC (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the SE and DS (P < 0.05). In the astigmatism group, the SE, DS, and DC were statistically different, and the DC of YD-SX-A was lower than that of CR and Topcon KR8800. Bland-Altman plots indicated that YD-SX-A has a moderate agreement with CR and Topcon KR8800. The sensitivity and specificity of YD-SX-A for detecting myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism were 90.17% and 90.32%, 97.78% and 87.88%, 84.08% and 74.26%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study has identified that YD-SX-A has shown good performance in both agreement and effectiveness in detecting refractive error when compared with Topcon KR8800 and CR. YD-SX-A could be a useful tool for large-scale population refractive screening.

Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in children with Down syndrome and other special needs.

BACKGROUND: Amblyopia is a common cause of monocular vision impairment and disproportionally affects developmentally delayed children. Photoscreeners have been suggested as a method to detect amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) in children with developmental disabilities who may not be amenable to traditional vision screening methods. The Spot Vision Screener is a commonly used photoscreener for detecting ARF and has shown excellent sensitivity and accuracy in the general pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its accuracy in children with Down syndrome and other special needs. METHODS: Children with various disabilities or delays were recruited from outpatient clinics at the Children's Hospital of Colorado. Participants had their photograph taken with Spot before and after pupil dilation and cycloplegia. Images were compared to results of a comprehensive clinical eye examination. RESULTS: A total of 100 children participated in the study. Images could not be obtained in 12 children; 5 children did not attend their clinical examination. The overall sensitivity of Spot was 90%, with a positive predictive value of 80% in undilated subjects. The area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79), which did not differ significantly from the AUROC after dilation/cycloplegia (0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The Spot Vision Screener could be used by primary care clinics and vision screening programs with a high sensitivity to determine which patients with Down syndrome and special needs should be referred for clinical examination.

Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.

PURPOSE: To compare the discrimination performance of 6-year-old children for optotypes from six paediatric visual acuity tests and to fit Luce's Biased Choice Model to the data to estimate the relative similarities and bias for each optotype. METHODS: Full data sets were collected from 20 typically developing 6-year-olds who had passed a vision screening. They were presented with single optotypes labelled 6/12 at a distance of 9 m and were asked to identify the optotype using a matching task containing all optotypes from the relevant test. The data were combined to form a confusion matrix for each test and a biased choice model was fitted to the data. RESULTS: Median correct performance varied from 40% to 100% across optotypes, with the HOTV test having the highest values. Estimates of the similarity of each pair of optotypes indicated equal values for all pairs in the Landolt C, HOTV, Lea numbers and Tumbling E tests. The values differed for the picture tests, that is Lea Symbols and Allen figures. The estimates of bias for each individual optotype also indicated different values with the picture tests. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies of the threshold acuity of young children and adults have indicated differences in acuity estimates across paediatric tests. A recognition acuity task typically requires resolving the difference information between optotypes. The performance of the 6-year-olds here reveals variance in similarity and bias values for picture tests, particularly for the Allen figures when compared with the Lea Symbols. Ideally, this analysis should be performed when designing new tests, and these results motivate progression from the use of current picture tests to well calibrated letter or number tests at the earliest possible age.

Novel Virtual Vision Screening Program: Give Kids Sight Day 2020.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a low-technology novel virtual vision screening protocol can reliably screen pediatric visual acuity. METHODS: Give Kids Sight Day (GKSD), an annual out-reach program, aims to provide free vision screening and ophthalmic care to underserved children in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Children were screened virtually through the low-technology protocol. Based on screening results, 152 children were provided in-person eye examinations. Data from in-person examinations were compared to data from virtual screenings for 151 children who were seen in-person. RESULTS: Of 475 children screened virtually, 152 children were seen in-person for examination, and 151 children were included in the analysis. Results from 151 children (mean age: 10.7 years, age range: 5 to 18 years, 43% female, 28% speaking a non-English language) were reviewed. There was a moderate correlation (R = .64, P < .0001; n = 100 children) between screening and in-person visual acuity without refractive correction and a strong correlation (R = 0.82, P < .0001; n = 18 children) between screening and in-person visual acuity with refractive correction. Of the 140 children who were seen in-person, 133 children were provided glasses prescriptions. Seventeen children required a referral to a pediatric ophthalmologist for evaluation of ophthalmic conditions, most commonly strabismus (5.3%) and amblyopia (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The GKSD virtual visual acuity testing demonstrated good correlation with in-person visual acuity testing, supporting the virtual screening approach as a useful tool for future applications in widespread community vision outreach programs. Further studies are needed to refine virtual ophthalmic screening to optimize its applications in bridging the gaps in ophthalmic care. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(6):390-395.].

Use of the World Health Organization primary eye care protocol to investigate the ocular health status of school children in Rwanda.

PURPOSE: To assess the ocular health status of primary and secondary schoolchildren in Rwanda and to explore the use of the World Health Organization (WHO) primary eye care screening protocol. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study across 19 schools in Rwanda. Initial screening was carried out using the WHO screening protocol, whereby visual acuity was measured using a tumbling E Snellen chart (6/60 and 6/12). Abnormal ocular features were identified using a flashlight and history against a checklist. All children with abnormal screening were referred to an on-site ophthalmic clinic for full examination. Those who could not be treated on-site were referred to an ophthalmologist at a hospital for specialist care. RESULTS: A total of 24,892 children underwent ocular health screening. Of those, 1,865 (7.5%) failed the primary screening; 658 (2.6%) were false positives (35.3% of those who failed screening), and 1,207 (4.8%) true positives. The most frequently observed ocular diagnoses were allergic conjunctivitis (3.11%) and strabismus (0.26%). Refractive error was very rare (0.18%). CONCLUSIONS: The WHO primary eye care curriculum provides existing health personnel with an approach to school-based vision screening that uses a standardized checklist and low-cost resources. In our study cohort, results indicated a low frequency of refractive error; the overwhelming majority of ocular problems could be identified on visual inspection.

Photoscreening for amblyopia risk factors assessment in young children: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Amblyopia is a leading cause of preventable and treatable vision loss in the pediatric population. Instrument-based screening of amblyopia-risk factors is being widely adopted but the audit of its results is still lacking. We sought to review the existing evidence regarding the outcomes of photoscreening applied to children under the age of three years. METHODS: A three-database search (Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus) was performed from inception to March 2021. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to summarize the referral rate, untestable rate and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS: Thirteen studies were selected among 705 original abstracts. The quantitative analysis included twelve studies enrolling 64,041 children. Of these, 13% (95%CI: 7-19%) were referred for further confirmation of the screening result. Astigmatism was the most common diagnosis both after screening and after ophthalmologic assessment of referred children. The pooled untestable rate and PPV were 8% (95%CI: 3-15%) and 56% (95%CI: 40-71%), respectively. CONCLUSION: There is no global consensus on the optimal age, frequency or what magnitude of refractive error must be considered an amblyopia-risk factor. Optimization of referral criteria is therefore warranted.

Utilization and barriers to eye care following school-wide pediatric vision screening.

OBJECTIVE: In August 2018, Ontario introduced the Child Visual Health and Vision Screening Protocol outlining school-based senior kindergarten (aged 4-6 years) vision screening. We determine the prevalence of children at risk based on screening in an Ontario community and follow up to determine resource utilization after screening. METHODS: Vision screening data (HOTV, Randot, Autorefractor) from 41 schools (1127 children) were collected for the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years. Phone follow-up was conducted 1-1.5 years after screening to determine whether an optometry visit occurred, if glasses were prescribed, and potential barriers to accessing eye care. Independent t tests were used to compare time to follow-up between groups, and χ2 testing was used for associations between material and social deprivation. RESULTS: Overall screening resulted in a 32.2% referral rate within our region. Of the referred children who responded, the rate of seeking out eye care was 69.9% (n = 64), and 65.2% of these visits were prompted specifically by vision screening, and 34.4% of referred children respondents were prescribed glasses. There was a significant relationship between receiving a referral and living in a more materially deprived (p = 0.001) and a more socially deprived area (p = 0.006). The most frequently reported barriers were related to insufficient insurance coverage for eye care or glasses, COVID-19-related difficulties, and scheduling conflicts. CONCLUSION: Our vision screening program identified and referred more than one third of children screened for follow-up eye examinations, with children in more deprived neighbourhoods being more frequently referred. Around two thirds of referred children sought care, and one third were prescribed glasses in the follow-up sample.

Non-Cycloplegic and Cycloplegic Autorefraction with Retinomax: An Agreement Study in Preschoolers in Los Angeles, California.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between non-cycloplegic autorefraction (NCAR) and cycloplegic autorefraction (CAR) in an ethnically diverse population of preschool-aged children and the validity of the screening criteria used to refer for further evaluation. METHODS: This study included data from 7,073 preschoolers who underwent NCAR and CAR, which enabled refractive error classification based on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) 2013 criteria. Right eye data of sphere and cylinder were used to compare NCAR to CAR via paired t-testing and vector analyses, and left eye data for an analysis on anisometropia. The sensitivity and specificity of screening referral criteria for refractive error were calculated. RESULTS: Mean values of sphere differed between NCAR and CAR by 1.95 ± 1.45 D (p < .05) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -0.94 to 4.85 D, with less discrepancy found in myopic eyes. The mean values of cylinder differed by -0.08 ± 0.43 D (p < .05) with 95% LoA of -0.93 to 0.77 D. Power vector results reflected a similar lack of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of our screening referral criteria were, respectively, 66% and 84% for myopia, 66% and 98% for hyperopia, and 98% and 58% for astigmatism. CONCLUSION: NCAR is insufficient in preschoolers for spherical refractive error referrals. Level of agreements was lower for spherical (15.5% within 0.5D) and higher for cylindrical refractive errors (89.6%) compared to CAR. In the absence of cycloplegic examination, screening programs using NCAR should utilize low referral thresholds for spherical refractive error.

Vision Impairment among Children in South India: Results from a Large-Scale School Eye Screening.

PURPOSE: To provide the prevalence of vision impairment and blindness among 250,000 school children aged 6 to 17 years, screened in Tamil Nadu, India. METHODS: The study was conducted between 2016 and 2019 as a part of the school eye screening program in Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu. The clinical examination included basic vision testing, objective refraction, subjective acceptance, spectacle dispensing, and a posterior segment evaluation. The prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, low vision, and the association with other demographic variables using logistic regression were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 250,052 children were screened in 1047 schools and the prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, and low vision in Kanchipuram district was 3.83%, 0.01%, 0.19%, respectively. The major causes for vision impairment, blindness, and low vision were refractive errors (3.05%), high myopia (0.002%), and refractive amblyopia (0.04%), respectively. Vision impairment was significantly associated with urban location (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.36-1.48, p < .0001), females (OR = 1.11, 95%CI - 1.08-1.15, p < .0001), private schools (OR = 2.43, 95%CI - 2.35-2.42, p < .0001), higher secondary class grade (OR = 1.69, 95%CI - 1.61-1.77, p = .001), high-school class grade (OR = 1.65, 95%CI - 1.58-1.72, p = .001) and middle school class grade (OR = 1.53, 95%CI - 1.47-1.59, p = .001). CONCLUSION: This large-scale school eye screening reports a comparatively lower prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, and low vision when compared to other studies conducted around the world. Although the overall prevalence is relatively low, the causes are mostly refractive. Urban, female, private school-going children aged 11-17 are at higher risk.

Positive predictive value of dual-modality vision screening in school children 4-7 years of age-a retrospective review in Queensland, Australia.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes and positive predictive value (PPV) of vision screening in schoolchildren 4-7 years of age through the Primary School Nurse Health Readiness Program (PSNHRP) in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective review of schoolchildren who underwent vision screening between January 2017 and December 2020 was conducted. Vision screening was performed through a dual-examination method, using the Parr 4m letter-matching vision test with crowding bars and the Spot photoscreener. Children were referred to an optometrist or ophthalmologist for review as required and if they failed either screening modality. PPVs were calculated based on whether a visual abnormality was confirmed by an ophthalmologist or optometrist. RESULTS: Of 185,685 eligible children, 176,164 (94.9%) consented to vision screening, 164,890 (93.6%) consented children underwent vision screening, and of those 12,148 (7.4%) were referred for an eye assessment. Of the 8,659 children with a known outcome (71.3% of referred), 6,011 (69.4% of known outcomes) had a confirmed visual abnormality and 2,648 (30.6%) children did not. The PPV was 0.73 when a referral was indicated by the photoscreener result, 0.76 when indicated by visual acuity testing, and 0.91 when indicated by both the photoscreener and visual acuity testing. CONCLUSIONS: The PSNHRP vision screening program showed a high uptake, and the dual screening method was effective in identifying visual abnormalities, with higher PPV when both visual acuity and photoscreener results indicated a need for referral.

Early Detection of Refractive Errors by Photorefraction at School Age.

Early detection and treatment of refractive defects during school age are essential to avoid irreversible future vision loss and potential school problems. Previously, vision screening of preschool children used methods based on subjective visual acuity; however, technologies such as photorefraction have promoted the detection of refractive errors quickly and easily. In this study, 1347 children from 10 schools in Madrid aged 4 to 12 years participated in a program of early detection of visual problems, which consisted of visual screening composed of anamnesis and photorefraction with a PlusOptix A12R. The prevalence of refractive errors was analyzed in terms of spherical equivalent, cylinder and its orientation, and potential cases of development of high myopia or amblyopia. Hyperopia predominates in the early years, but the number of myopic subjects is higher than that of hyperopic subjects from the age of ten onwards. At all ages, the predominant orientation of astigmatism was with-the-rule. On average, 80% of the myopic subjects were uncorrected. Potential high myopia increased with age, from 4 to 21% of the measured population. Potential amblyopia cases decreased across age groups, from 19 to 13.7%. There is a need to raise awareness of the importance of vision screening at school age to address vision problems.

Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was - 0.13D for M, - 0.0002D (J0) and - 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was - 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/- 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/- 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel.